<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Itzle Real-Time Website Communication</title>
	<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/380/itzle-real-time-website-communication/</link>
	<description>Solution Watch surveys the bleeding-edge of the productivity world, reviewing and providing in-depth walkthroughs of today's best services all day and every day.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon,  1 Dec 2008 20:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Krusty</title>
		<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/380/itzle-real-time-website-communication/#comment-108472</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.solutionwatch.com/380/itzle-real-time-website-communication/#comment-108472</guid>
					<description>hola a todos</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hola a todos
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ecler</title>
		<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/380/itzle-real-time-website-communication/#comment-91922</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.solutionwatch.com/380/itzle-real-time-website-communication/#comment-91922</guid>
					<description>never</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>never
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: itzling Through the Web - rev2.org</title>
		<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/380/itzle-real-time-website-communication/#comment-3361</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 10:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.solutionwatch.com/380/itzle-real-time-website-communication/#comment-3361</guid>
					<description>[...] itzle is a neat idea which allows you to interactively chat with other users who are on the same webpage as you&#8217;re on, hence making each one and giving the feel of a physical location. This is a very similar idea to Gabbly, but undoubtedly much much more interactive. I have to agree with others on this, as cool as the idea is (and the service), there&#8217;s no real need for it (still very cool though).     Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] itzle is a neat idea which allows you to interactively chat with other users who are on the same webpage as you&#8217;re on, hence making each one and giving the feel of a physical location. This is a very similar idea to Gabbly, but undoubtedly much much more interactive. I have to agree with others on this, as cool as the idea is (and the service), there&#8217;s no real need for it (still very cool though).     Comments [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: nuno bastei</title>
		<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/380/itzle-real-time-website-communication/#comment-3330</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 17:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.solutionwatch.com/380/itzle-real-time-website-communication/#comment-3330</guid>
					<description>Guys, there also is SamePlace (&lt;a href="http://www.sameplace.cc/" rel="nofollow"&gt;website&lt;/a&gt;) that provides the same kind of service, through a Firefox extension. Currently, it's under development, released in alpha version only. But it's quite cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys, there also is SamePlace (<a href="http://www.sameplace.cc/" rel="nofollow">website</a>) that provides the same kind of service, through a Firefox extension. Currently, it&#8217;s under development, released in alpha version only. But it&#8217;s quite cool.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: henri</title>
		<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/380/itzle-real-time-website-communication/#comment-3300</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 12:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.solutionwatch.com/380/itzle-real-time-website-communication/#comment-3300</guid>
					<description>Where are you I can't find you ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where are you I can&#8217;t find you ;)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sphere Blog Search &#187; Solution Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/380/itzle-real-time-website-communication/#comment-3285</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 02:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.solutionwatch.com/380/itzle-real-time-website-communication/#comment-3285</guid>
					<description>[...] I like speed when it comes to blog searching and when a new service is released, I want to see posts relating to it as soon as possible. For this, I often use Google Blog Search, which is my prefered blog search for immediate results. To test, I analyzed results for Itzle, a service I have reviewed a few hours ago. Before posting, I checked the results for Google Blog Search, Technorati, and Sphere. Google returned two results, Technorati returned one, and Sphere returned zero. I then published my post. I found that Google displayed my post in around 20 minutes of posting and Technorati within the hour, along with the another blog&#8217;s post that I originally saw in Google&#8217;s results before posting. Sphere however seemed to take a little more then an hour and a half, which really isn&#8217;t all that bad, especially for just launching (really, I&#8217;m impressed that is already that quick)! But for now, I&#8217;m still going to stick with Google when it comes to getting results as soon as possible. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I like speed when it comes to blog searching and when a new service is released, I want to see posts relating to it as soon as possible. For this, I often use Google Blog Search, which is my prefered blog search for immediate results. To test, I analyzed results for Itzle, a service I have reviewed a few hours ago. Before posting, I checked the results for Google Blog Search, Technorati, and Sphere. Google returned two results, Technorati returned one, and Sphere returned zero. I then published my post. I found that Google displayed my post in around 20 minutes of posting and Technorati within the hour, along with the another blog&#8217;s post that I originally saw in Google&#8217;s results before posting. Sphere however seemed to take a little more then an hour and a half, which really isn&#8217;t all that bad, especially for just launching (really, I&#8217;m impressed that is already that quick)! But for now, I&#8217;m still going to stick with Google when it comes to getting results as soon as possible. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
