<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Word Processing with AjaxWrite</title>
	<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/331/online-word-processing-with-ajaxwrite/</link>
	<description>Solution Watch surveys the bleeding-edge of the productivity world, reviewing and providing in-depth walkthroughs of today's best services all day and every day.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jigsaw hc</title>
		<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/331/online-word-processing-with-ajaxwrite/#comment-163465</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.solutionwatch.com/331/online-word-processing-with-ajaxwrite/#comment-163465</guid>
					<description>I tried AjaxWrite, but I prefer Zoho Writer.  It loads much faster for me and AjaxWrite had some issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried AjaxWrite, but I prefer Zoho Writer.  It loads much faster for me and AjaxWrite had some issues.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: hiru puntu zero &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Online textu editoreak: ajaxWrite, Writely, etab.</title>
		<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/331/online-word-processing-with-ajaxwrite/#comment-2360</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.solutionwatch.com/331/online-word-processing-with-ajaxwrite/#comment-2360</guid>
					<description>[...] Azkenengo egunotan dexente hitz egin da ajaxWrite zerbitzuari buruz. ajaxWrite, online textu editore horietako bat da, orain arte erabili dugun Microsoft Word edo OpenOffice-a baina web zerbitzu gisa, hau da, zure nabigatzailea erabiliz funtzionatzen duena. Berain hitzetan, hauxe da ajaxWrite: Microsoft Word-ek duen itzura, sentsazio eta funtzionalitatea berdina baina web bidezko AJAX plataforma baten bidez. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Azkenengo egunotan dexente hitz egin da ajaxWrite zerbitzuari buruz. ajaxWrite, online textu editore horietako bat da, orain arte erabili dugun Microsoft Word edo OpenOffice-a baina web zerbitzu gisa, hau da, zure nabigatzailea erabiliz funtzionatzen duena. Berain hitzetan, hauxe da ajaxWrite: Microsoft Word-ek duen itzura, sentsazio eta funtzionalitatea berdina baina web bidezko AJAX plataforma baten bidez. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: IT&#124;Redux &#187; Three is Even Better</title>
		<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/331/online-word-processing-with-ajaxwrite/#comment-2280</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 01:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.solutionwatch.com/331/online-word-processing-with-ajaxwrite/#comment-2280</guid>
					<description>[...] ajaxWrite is an alternative to Writely and Zoho Writer, and got a good review from Brian Benzinger on Solution Watch. It sports a user interface very similar to the one popularized by Microsoft Word, and I tend to believe that such a design choice will be required to convert existing Word users, even though the Google-like approach favored by Zoho Writer might actually lead to improved end-user productivity. Multiple stylesheets that go beyond color schemes and provide radically different user interfaces on top of the same infrastructure might be the answer on the long run: get existing Microsoft Office users converted through the use of an Office-like user interface, then let them upgrade to a Web 2.0 model with a single mouse click. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] ajaxWrite is an alternative to Writely and Zoho Writer, and got a good review from Brian Benzinger on Solution Watch. It sports a user interface very similar to the one popularized by Microsoft Word, and I tend to believe that such a design choice will be required to convert existing Word users, even though the Google-like approach favored by Zoho Writer might actually lead to improved end-user productivity. Multiple stylesheets that go beyond color schemes and provide radically different user interfaces on top of the same infrastructure might be the answer on the long run: get existing Microsoft Office users converted through the use of an Office-like user interface, then let them upgrade to a Web 2.0 model with a single mouse click. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bill Webb</title>
		<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/331/online-word-processing-with-ajaxwrite/#comment-2249</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.solutionwatch.com/331/online-word-processing-with-ajaxwrite/#comment-2249</guid>
					<description>ps: As it is, they work pretty well.  I use Writely for most things that don't require complex formatting, because I move around among a work computer, my laptop and home machine.  It's convenient as heck.  (Of course I don't belong to any subversive organizations, unless you count the ACLU and Mensa.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ps: As it is, they work pretty well.  I use Writely for most things that don&#8217;t require complex formatting, because I move around among a work computer, my laptop and home machine.  It&#8217;s convenient as heck.  (Of course I don&#8217;t belong to any subversive organizations, unless you count the ACLU and Mensa.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bill Webb</title>
		<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/331/online-word-processing-with-ajaxwrite/#comment-2247</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.solutionwatch.com/331/online-word-processing-with-ajaxwrite/#comment-2247</guid>
					<description>The advantage of ajaxWrite is a familiar interface and the ability to open and save documents without first exporting them to the Web, as with Writely, Zoho and the others.  It's ideal for students, for example, who don't have laptops and have to share computers.  Let's hope that Mike's folks continue to improve on it.  It's intended to fill a niche, not put the 100% web-based apps out of business. Nor is the purpose to put M$ behind the 8-ball, although the hype would lead you to think so.  We have webmail (Yahoo's comes to mind, in addition to Gmail - have you looked at Y! lately?) that is quite competitive, yet no one's worrying about the death of Outlook, Eudora and TBird - at least not yet.

Remember that Robertson is the guy behind MP3.com and Linspire.  He doesn't usually back losers.  (And if you think Linspire is a loser, download Linspire Live and use it for a day or two, pretending you're not a geek.  It's not meant for geeks.)

IMNSHO, the thing that will make all these things completely viable and a threat will be (a) universal broadband and (b) really secure on-the-fly encryption/decryption for the web, that's simple to use.  Once fast access and transmission that's truly secure (unless the opposition has a Cray) is available, these web applications will explode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The advantage of ajaxWrite is a familiar interface and the ability to open and save documents without first exporting them to the Web, as with Writely, Zoho and the others.  It&#8217;s ideal for students, for example, who don&#8217;t have laptops and have to share computers.  Let&#8217;s hope that Mike&#8217;s folks continue to improve on it.  It&#8217;s intended to fill a niche, not put the 100% web-based apps out of business. Nor is the purpose to put M$ behind the 8-ball, although the hype would lead you to think so.  We have webmail (Yahoo&#8217;s comes to mind, in addition to Gmail - have you looked at Y! lately?) that is quite competitive, yet no one&#8217;s worrying about the death of Outlook, Eudora and TBird - at least not yet.</p>
<p>Remember that Robertson is the guy behind MP3.com and Linspire.  He doesn&#8217;t usually back losers.  (And if you think Linspire is a loser, download Linspire Live and use it for a day or two, pretending you&#8217;re not a geek.  It&#8217;s not meant for geeks.)</p>
<p>IMNSHO, the thing that will make all these things completely viable and a threat will be (a) universal broadband and (b) really secure on-the-fly encryption/decryption for the web, that&#8217;s simple to use.  Once fast access and transmission that&#8217;s truly secure (unless the opposition has a Cray) is available, these web applications will explode.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Razvan Antonescu &#187; Dirty SEO: a possible explanasion for the AjaxWrite success</title>
		<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/331/online-word-processing-with-ajaxwrite/#comment-2237</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.solutionwatch.com/331/online-word-processing-with-ajaxwrite/#comment-2237</guid>
					<description>[...] Solution watch: Online Word Processing with AjaxWrite [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Solution watch: Online Word Processing with AjaxWrite [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mikael</title>
		<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/331/online-word-processing-with-ajaxwrite/#comment-2226</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.solutionwatch.com/331/online-word-processing-with-ajaxwrite/#comment-2226</guid>
					<description>You can do stuff with Ajax without XUL too.. 
  http://www.naltabyte.se/write.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can do stuff with Ajax without XUL too..<br />
  <a href="http://www.naltabyte.se/write.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.naltabyte.se/write.asp</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brian Benzinger</title>
		<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/331/online-word-processing-with-ajaxwrite/#comment-2225</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.solutionwatch.com/331/online-word-processing-with-ajaxwrite/#comment-2225</guid>
					<description>Anonymous, I actually completely agree with you. It isnt much more then your basic DHTML WYSIWYG editor. Like I said in the post:

"I feel that the strong point with AjaxWriter though is that you can open and save any Word, RTF, Text, and even PDF documents online without needing any additional software and for free. It is that which seperates it from your usual online WYSIWYG editor."

It is the open and save options that got me and that is the main reason I like it really. Otherwise, its nothing special.. although the tabbing is nice too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous, I actually completely agree with you. It isnt much more then your basic DHTML WYSIWYG editor. Like I said in the post:</p>
<p>&#8220;I feel that the strong point with AjaxWriter though is that you can open and save any Word, RTF, Text, and even PDF documents online without needing any additional software and for free. It is that which seperates it from your usual online WYSIWYG editor.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is the open and save options that got me and that is the main reason I like it really. Otherwise, its nothing special.. although the tabbing is nice too.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymouse coward</title>
		<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/331/online-word-processing-with-ajaxwrite/#comment-2224</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.solutionwatch.com/331/online-word-processing-with-ajaxwrite/#comment-2224</guid>
					<description>ok, am i the only one that thinks this is really nothing special. stuff like this has been around for over a year now and can be easily integrated into your website. seems like everyone is jumping on the i'll praise your web2.0 project if you praise mine band wagon. that's why i'm posting anonymous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, am i the only one that thinks this is really nothing special. stuff like this has been around for over a year now and can be easily integrated into your website. seems like everyone is jumping on the i&#8217;ll praise your web2.0 project if you praise mine band wagon. that&#8217;s why i&#8217;m posting anonymous.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Affiliate Rant! &#187; AjaxWrite = Cool = Infancy</title>
		<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/331/online-word-processing-with-ajaxwrite/#comment-2201</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.solutionwatch.com/331/online-word-processing-with-ajaxwrite/#comment-2201</guid>
					<description>[...] (Quoted: Online Word Processing with AjaxWrite &#187; Solution Watch Via Solution Watch.)  -BW Griggs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] (Quoted: Online Word Processing with AjaxWrite &raquo; Solution Watch Via Solution Watch.)  -BW Griggs [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
