<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Reader Reviewed, Part Two</title>
	<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/251/google-reader-reviewed-part-two/</link>
	<description>Solution Watch surveys the bleeding-edge of the productivity world, reviewing and providing in-depth walkthroughs of today's best services all day and every day.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Library clips</title>
		<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/251/google-reader-reviewed-part-two/#comment-327</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.solutionwatch.com/251/google-reader-reviewed-part-two/#comment-327</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google Reader cooking in the labs&lt;/strong&gt;

	Google Reader is Google&#8217;s foray into the heavy weight RSS reader market.
Looks great, has some good functionality, but not good enough for my liking, although if it changed 3 or 4 features it would be a good competitor in the advanced RSS reader...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Reader cooking in the labs</strong></p>
<p>	Google Reader is Google&#8217;s foray into the heavy weight RSS reader market.<br />
Looks great, has some good functionality, but not good enough for my liking, although if it changed 3 or 4 features it would be a good competitor in the advanced RSS reader&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: deletedsoul</title>
		<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/251/google-reader-reviewed-part-two/#comment-226</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2005 20:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.solutionwatch.com/251/google-reader-reviewed-part-two/#comment-226</guid>
					<description>I was excited to read the Google released a feed reader. I played around with it a bit this morning, but I would have to say at this point I am going to stick with &lt;a href="http://www.bloglines.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Bloglines&lt;/a&gt;. I do like the "recently read" feature in Google's version, but I like the setup of Bloglines better. I also use blogrolls religiously for my site, and I like the way Bloglines handles sharing. 

I think Google has made a good start with Reader, I will definately keep up with further improvements on this project. We will see where this goes. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was excited to read the Google released a feed reader. I played around with it a bit this morning, but I would have to say at this point I am going to stick with <a href="http://www.bloglines.com" rel="nofollow">Bloglines</a>. I do like the &#8220;recently read&#8221; feature in Google&#8217;s version, but I like the setup of Bloglines better. I also use blogrolls religiously for my site, and I like the way Bloglines handles sharing. </p>
<p>I think Google has made a good start with Reader, I will definately keep up with further improvements on this project. We will see where this goes. :)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
