<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Reader Reviewed, Part Two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.solutionwatch.com/251/google-reader-reviewed-part-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/251/google-reader-reviewed-part-two/</link>
	<description>Solution Watch surveys the bleeding-edge of the productivity world, reviewing and providing in-depth walkthroughs of today's best services all day and every day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:03:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Library clips</title>
		<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/251/google-reader-reviewed-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Library clips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solutionwatch.com/251/google-reader-reviewed-part-two/#comment-327</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google Reader cooking in the labs&lt;/strong&gt;

	Google Reader is Google&#8217;s foray into the heavy weight RSS reader market.
Looks great, has some good functionality, but not good enough for my liking, although if it changed 3 or 4 features it would be a good competitor in the advanced RSS reader...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Reader cooking in the labs</strong></p>
<p>	Google Reader is Google&#8217;s foray into the heavy weight RSS reader market.<br />
Looks great, has some good functionality, but not good enough for my liking, although if it changed 3 or 4 features it would be a good competitor in the advanced RSS reader&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deletedsoul</title>
		<link>http://www.solutionwatch.com/251/google-reader-reviewed-part-two/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>deletedsoul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2005 20:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solutionwatch.com/251/google-reader-reviewed-part-two/#comment-226</guid>
		<description>I was excited to read the Google released a feed reader. I played around with it a bit this morning, but I would have to say at this point I am going to stick with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloglines.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bloglines&lt;/a&gt;. I do like the &quot;recently read&quot; feature in Google&#039;s version, but I like the setup of Bloglines better. I also use blogrolls religiously for my site, and I like the way Bloglines handles sharing. 

I think Google has made a good start with Reader, I will definately keep up with further improvements on this project. We will see where this goes. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was excited to read the Google released a feed reader. I played around with it a bit this morning, but I would have to say at this point I am going to stick with <a href="http://www.bloglines.com" rel="nofollow">Bloglines</a>. I do like the &#8220;recently read&#8221; feature in Google&#8217;s version, but I like the setup of Bloglines better. I also use blogrolls religiously for my site, and I like the way Bloglines handles sharing. </p>
<p>I think Google has made a good start with Reader, I will definately keep up with further improvements on this project. We will see where this goes. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

